One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 419,397 recorded births

Abigail

#41 in the US in 2025

Where Abigail stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#41girls’ names · US 2025

Abigail was the 41st most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 4,941 births.

peak 2003 · 15,932188019532025

Its moment was 2003, when 15,932 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#41US rank, 2025 (girls)
4,941US births in 2025
#4its best US rank, in 2005
2003peak year — 15,932 births
413,263US births since 1880
3,040NZ births since 1972
3,094E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Abigail's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Abigail was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Abigail in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0436872
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Abigail in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 54% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Abigail in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Abigail has been registered 3,040 times since 1972, peaking in 2010 with 114 births. It ranked #88 for girls in 2025 on 43 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0326652
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Abigail in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Abigail in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Abigail was registered 3,094 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 634 births. It ranked #171 for girls in 2025 on 283 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0113226
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Abigail in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#49212
1890#9409
1900#1,00814
1910#1,11016
1920#1,37533
1930#1,56925
1940#1,03548
1950#824112
1960#673228
1970#526362
1980#1761,577
1990#903,719
2000#1413,094
2010#714,257
2020#127,917

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Abigail most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California42,154
Texas38,521
New York22,561
Ohio18,762
Florida18,632
Pennsylvania18,233
Illinois18,178
Michigan13,213
North Carolina12,490
Georgia12,164

Questions about Abigail

How popular is the name Abigail?

Abigail ranked #41 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 4,941 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Abigail most popular?

Abigail peaked in 2003, when 15,932 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Abigail rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Abigail has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-54%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2003, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.