One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 70,408 recorded births

Alberta

#9,457 in the US in 2025

Where Alberta stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#9,457girls’ names · US 2025

Alberta was the 9,457th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 10 births.

peak 1919 · 2,017188019532025

Its moment was 1919, when 2,017 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#9,457US rank, 2025 (girls)
10US births in 2025
#104its best US rank, in 1910
1919peak year — 2,017 births
70,365US births since 1880
43E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Alberta's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Alberta was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Alberta in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0106213
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Alberta in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 58% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Alberta in New Zealand

Alberta never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Alberta in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Alberta was registered 43 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 11 births. It ranked #4,200 for girls in 2025 on 5 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.02.03.9
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Alberta in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#17176
1890#182165
1900#119541
1910#104832
1920#1281,967
1930#1461,464
1940#195927
1950#315606
1960#500374
1970#920140
1980#1,69267
1990#2,73742
2000#4,52726
2010#7,51316
2020#9,54610

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Alberta most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Pennsylvania5,509
Ohio3,312
New York3,297
Illinois2,979
Mississippi2,907
Alabama2,480
Georgia2,465
South Carolina2,435
Texas2,088
Missouri2,052

Questions about Alberta

How popular is the name Alberta?

Alberta ranked #9,457 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 10 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Alberta most popular?

Alberta peaked in 1919, when 2,017 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Alberta rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Alberta has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+58%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1919, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.