One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 801,448 recorded births

Amanda

#493 in the US in 2025

Where Amanda stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#493girls’ names · US 2025

Amanda was the 493rd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 601 births.

peak 1987 · 41,786188019532025

Its moment was 1987, when 41,786 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#493US rank, 2025 (girls)
601US births in 2025
#2its best US rank, in 1980
1987peak year — 41,786 births
790,638US births since 1880
8,353NZ births since 1954
321E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Amanda's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Amanda was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Amanda in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.012022403
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Amanda in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 34% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Amanda in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Amanda has been registered 8,353 times since 1954, peaking in 1986 with 353 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.09321864
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Amanda in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Amanda in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Amanda was registered 321 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 57 births. It ranked #983 for girls in 2025 on 35 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.01020
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Amanda in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#89241
1890#104392
1900#154377
1910#229278
1920#335379
1930#478196
1940#453218
1950#410380
1960#296978
1970#1083,545
1980#235,811
1990#434,413
2000#328,558
2010#1881,664
2020#444695

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Amanda most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California69,484
Texas61,968
New York48,469
Ohio40,088
Pennsylvania37,460
Florida35,871
Illinois33,619
Michigan30,672
Georgia22,754
Indiana22,095

Questions about Amanda

How popular is the name Amanda?

Amanda ranked #493 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 601 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Amanda most popular?

Amanda peaked in 1987, when 41,786 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Amanda rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Amanda has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-34%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1987, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.