One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 71,780 recorded births

Annabelle

#343 in the US in 2025

Where Annabelle stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#343girls’ names · US 2025

Annabelle was the 343rd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 891 births.

peak 2014 · 4,363188019532025

Its moment was 2014, when 4,363 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#343US rank, 2025 (girls)
891US births in 2025
#57its best US rank, in 2014
2014peak year — 4,363 births
67,543US births since 1880
1,218NZ births since 1972
3,019E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Annabelle's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Annabelle was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Annabelle in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0122244
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Annabelle in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 67% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Annabelle in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Annabelle has been registered 1,218 times since 1972, peaking in 2010 with 75 births. It ranked #154 for girls in 2025 on 25 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0217434
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Annabelle in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Annabelle in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Annabelle was registered 3,019 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 622 births. It ranked #149 for girls in 2025 on 337 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0111222
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Annabelle in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#5809
1890#40040
1900#38873
1910#361121
1920#273571
1930#309462
1940#504188
1950#890100
1960#1,37364
1970#1,38975
1980#1,90456
1990#1,90573
2000#464597
2010#1172,640
2020#2201,322

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Annabelle most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California5,851
Texas4,319
New York3,686
Ohio3,459
Pennsylvania3,299
Illinois2,915
Florida2,888
Michigan2,576
Indiana2,121
Virginia1,833

Questions about Annabelle

How popular is the name Annabelle?

Annabelle ranked #343 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 891 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Annabelle most popular?

Annabelle peaked in 2014, when 4,363 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Annabelle rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Annabelle has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-67%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2014, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.