One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 33,652 recorded births

Bert

#10,695 in the US in 2025

Where Bert stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#10,695boys’ names · US 2025

Bert was the 10,695th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 6 births.

peak 1918 · 698188019532025

Its moment was 1918, when 698 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#10,695US rank, 2025 (boys)
6US births in 2025
#47its best US rank, in 1880
1918peak year — 698 births
33,585US births since 1880
30NZ births since 1916
37E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Bert's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Bert was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Bert in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0157315
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bert in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 52% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bert in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Bert has been registered 30 times since 1916, peaking in 1928 with 10 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.04285
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bert in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bert in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Bert was registered 37 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 9 births. It ranked #5,136 for boys in 2025 on 3 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.01.63.2
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bert in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#47348
1890#97180
1900#142153
1910#190141
1920#218593
1930#232542
1940#284384
1950#368339
1960#400391
1970#518241
1980#808118
1990#1,51656
2000#3,76421
2010#8,1399
2020#8,0679

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Bert most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California2,136
New York1,879
Texas1,680
Illinois1,480
Ohio1,207
Michigan1,201
Pennsylvania1,052
Kentucky927
Oklahoma885
Missouri822

Questions about Bert

How popular is the name Bert?

Bert ranked #10,695 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 6 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Bert most popular?

Bert peaked in 1918, when 698 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Bert rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Bert has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-52%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1918, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.