One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 1,012,381 recorded births

Betty

#1,113 in the US in 2025

Where Betty stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,113girls’ names · US 2025

Betty was the 1,113th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 212 births.

peak 1930 · 38,240188019532025

Its moment was 1930, when 38,240 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,113US rank, 2025 (girls)
212US births in 2025
#2its best US rank, in 1928
1930peak year — 38,240 births
1,001,238US births since 1880
6,755NZ births since 1908
769E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Betty's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Betty was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Betty in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.016983396
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Betty in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 31% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Betty in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Betty has been registered 6,755 times since 1908, peaking in 1928 with 364 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.016163232
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Betty in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Betty in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Betty was registered 769 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 124 births. It ranked #391 for girls in 2025 on 108 births.

20200.02347
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Betty in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#136117
1890#164216
1900#100665
1910#691,389
1920#1114,016
1930#238,240
1940#522,077
1950#2613,615
1960#686,501
1970#1691,966
1980#358658
1990#572406
2000#1,150176
2010#1,593136
2020#1,173198

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Betty most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Pennsylvania66,290
Ohio60,182
Texas54,581
Illinois49,019
North Carolina44,002
Georgia40,802
New York39,753
Michigan36,371
Tennessee36,333
California36,253

Questions about Betty

How popular is the name Betty?

Betty ranked #1,113 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 212 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Betty most popular?

Betty peaked in 1930, when 38,240 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Betty rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Betty has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+31%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1930, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.