One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 22,920 recorded births

Bettye

22,920 US births on record

Where Bettye stands

United States register · 1880–2025

22,920US births · 1883–2025

Bettye has been registered 22,920 times in the United States since 1883. It did not clear the 5-birth reporting floor in 2025, so the SSA published no figure for it that year.

peak 1933 · 763188019532025

Its moment was 1933, when 763 babies were given it. In 14 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

<5US births in 2025 — below the reporting floor, so not published
#220its best US rank, in 1933
1933peak year — 763 births
22,920US births since 1883
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Bettye's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Bettye was under the floor in 14 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Bettye in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.03876
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bettye in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 1985 and 1998 the name has been falling — down 30% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bettye in New Zealand

Bettye never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bettye in England & Wales

Bettye does not appear in the ONS list for England and Wales. That means it was given to fewer than 3 babies in every year from 2019 to 2025 — not that it is unused there. ONS publishes only those seven years, so a name that had its moment in England before 2019 is invisible here however common it once was.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1890below floor<5
1900#1,3199
1910#76831
1920#578154
1930#224751
1940#240704
1950#360480
1960#1,070101
1970#2,77925
1980#6,31910
1990#9,2478
2000below floor<5
2010below floor<5
2020below floor<5

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Bettye most often since 1883. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas3,264
Tennessee2,580
Alabama2,542
Mississippi2,283
Georgia1,640
Arkansas1,383
Louisiana1,115
Kentucky882
Florida841
Oklahoma777

Questions about Bettye

How popular is the name Bettye?

Bettye did not clear the 5-birth reporting floor in 2025, so no figure was published for it that year. Its best US rank was #220 in 1933.

When was Bettye most popular?

Bettye peaked in 1933, when 763 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Bettye rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Bettye has been falling between 1985 and 1998 (-30%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1933, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.