One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 113,346 recorded births

Cecilia

#108 in the US in 2025

Where Cecilia stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#108girls’ names · US 2025

Cecilia was the 108th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 2,506 births.

peak 2025 · 2,506188019532025

Its moment was 2025, when 2,506 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#108US rank, 2025 (girls)
2,506US births in 2025
#108its best US rank, in 2025
2025peak year — 2,506 births
111,511US births since 1880
654NZ births since 1900
1,181E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Cecilia's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Cecilia was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Cecilia in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.078156
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Cecilia in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 51% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Cecilia in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Cecilia has been registered 654 times since 1900, peaking in 1913 with 23 births. It ranked #220 for girls in 2025 on 18 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0100199
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Cecilia in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Cecilia in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Cecilia was registered 1,181 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 282 births. It ranked #172 for girls in 2025 on 282 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.056111
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Cecilia in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#23344
1890#26291
1900#199249
1910#225287
1920#237757
1930#262567
1940#252629
1950#249921
1960#2831,036
1970#383621
1980#361654
1990#326847
2000#2831,137
2010#2771,202
2020#1471,860

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Cecilia most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California17,390
Texas12,728
New York7,419
Pennsylvania5,394
Illinois5,367
Ohio3,831
Michigan3,718
Florida3,247
New Jersey2,893
Arizona2,750

Questions about Cecilia

How popular is the name Cecilia?

Cecilia ranked #108 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 2,506 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Cecilia most popular?

Cecilia peaked in 2025, when 2,506 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Cecilia rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Cecilia has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+51%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2025, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.