One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 263,636 recorded births

Curtis

#984 in the US in 2025

Where Curtis stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#984boys’ names · US 2025

Curtis was the 984th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 232 births.

peak 1962 · 5,569188019532025

Its moment was 1962, when 5,569 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#984US rank, 2025 (boys)
232US births in 2025
#72its best US rank, in 1963
1962peak year — 5,569 births
260,554US births since 1880
489NZ births since 1979
271E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Curtis's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Curtis was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Curtis in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0135269
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Curtis in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 49% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Curtis in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Curtis has been registered 489 times since 1979, peaking in 1996 with 31 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.073146
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Curtis in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Curtis in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Curtis was registered 271 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 66 births. It ranked #1,035 for boys in 2025 on 29 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.01122
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Curtis in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#18668
1890#16486
1900#147144
1910#114277
1920#1201,443
1930#1061,721
1940#972,103
1950#973,209
1960#795,363
1970#883,615
1980#893,332
1990#1212,800
2000#2651,240
2010#424652
2020#702361

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Curtis most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas18,711
California16,780
Georgia11,214
Illinois11,122
North Carolina10,661
Ohio10,208
Pennsylvania9,873
Alabama9,482
New York9,331
Virginia9,266

Questions about Curtis

How popular is the name Curtis?

Curtis ranked #984 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 232 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Curtis most popular?

Curtis peaked in 1962, when 5,569 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Curtis rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Curtis has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-49%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1962, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.