One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 374,617 recorded births

Diana

#244 in the US in 2025

Where Diana stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#244girls’ names · US 2025

Diana was the 244th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,277 births.

peak 1957 · 9,433188019532025

Its moment was 1957, when 9,433 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#244US rank, 2025 (girls)
1,277US births in 2025
#42its best US rank, in 1946
1957peak year — 9,433 births
368,487US births since 1880
3,666NZ births since 1920
1,180E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Diana's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Diana was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Diana in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0240480
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Diana in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Diana in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Diana has been registered 3,666 times since 1920, peaking in 1958 with 113 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0326651
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Diana in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Diana in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Diana was registered 1,180 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 181 births. It ranked #275 for girls in 2025 on 165 births.

20200.03467
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Diana in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#54710
1890#75813
1900#65629
1910#55055
1920#443232
1930#263564
1940#1172,195
1950#477,447
1960#538,327
1970#894,373
1980#1182,614
1990#983,548
2000#1063,167
2010#1901,622
2020#2451,236

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Diana most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California64,175
Texas38,584
New York35,232
Illinois21,741
Ohio18,548
Pennsylvania14,688
Michigan12,127
Indiana11,861
New Jersey10,878
Florida10,135

Questions about Diana

How popular is the name Diana?

Diana ranked #244 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 1,277 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Diana most popular?

Diana peaked in 1957, when 9,433 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Diana rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Diana has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1957, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.