One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 39,934 recorded births

Ebony

#5,410 in the US in 2025

Where Ebony stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#5,410girls’ names · US 2025

Ebony was the 5,410th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 23 births.

peak 1982 · 2,279188019532025

Its moment was 1982, when 2,279 babies were given it. In 15 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#5,410US rank, 2025 (girls)
23US births in 2025
#132its best US rank, in 1982
1982peak year — 2,279 births
38,998US births since 1950
452NZ births since 1982
484E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Ebony's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Ebony was under the floor in 15 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Ebony in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.067135
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Ebony in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 64% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Ebony in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Ebony has been registered 452 times since 1982, peaking in 1995 with 26 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.072144
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Ebony in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Ebony in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Ebony was registered 484 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 116 births. It ranked #872 for girls in 2025 on 40 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.02141
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Ebony in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1950#4,7386
1960below floor<5
1970#1,68155
1980#1751,581
1990#1861,567
2000#552474
2010#1,747119
2020#4,54829

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Ebony most often since 1950. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York4,131
California3,286
Texas2,490
Florida2,118
Illinois2,094
Michigan1,846
Ohio1,764
North Carolina1,734
Georgia1,483
Virginia1,450

Questions about Ebony

How popular is the name Ebony?

Ebony ranked #5,410 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 23 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Ebony most popular?

Ebony peaked in 1982, when 2,279 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Ebony rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Ebony has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-64%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1982, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.