Elma
#4,352 in the US in 2025
Where Elma stands
#4,352girls’ names · US 2025
Elma was the 4,352nd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 32 births.
Its moment was 1918, when 659 babies were given it.
SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
How Elma's figures are worked out
- Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
- Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
- The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
- The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
- A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Elma was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000 reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
Elma in the United States
Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 31% as a share of girls' births.
SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Elma in New Zealand
In New Zealand, Elma has been registered 144 times since 1901, peaking in 1916 with 21 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.
SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Elma in England & Wales
In England and Wales, Elma was registered 122 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 31 births. It ranked #1,079 for girls in 2025 on 31 births. Across those years it has been rising.
Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.
SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026
Decade by decade in the US
| Year | Rank | Births |
|---|---|---|
| 1880 | #294 | 28 |
| 1890 | #234 | 108 |
| 1900 | #235 | 182 |
| 1910 | #234 | 273 |
| 1920 | #266 | 600 |
| 1930 | #345 | 362 |
| 1940 | #470 | 204 |
| 1950 | #717 | 143 |
| 1960 | #1,020 | 111 |
| 1970 | #2,267 | 34 |
| 1980 | #3,609 | 22 |
| 1990 | #6,131 | 14 |
| 2000 | #3,453 | 38 |
| 2010 | #4,608 | 31 |
| 2020 | #6,325 | 18 |
<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.
Where in the United States
The states that registered Elma most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.
| State | Births |
|---|---|
| Texas | 2,028 |
| North Carolina | 943 |
| Pennsylvania | 861 |
| Louisiana | 700 |
| New York | 622 |
| Ohio | 609 |
| Mississippi | 605 |
| Alabama | 525 |
| California | 522 |
| Georgia | 522 |
Questions about Elma
How popular is the name Elma?
Elma ranked #4,352 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 32 births registered with the Social Security Administration.
When was Elma most popular?
Elma peaked in 1918, when 659 babies in the United States were given the name.
Is Elma rising or falling?
Measured as a share of all girls' births, Elma has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+31%).
Names that had their moment when Elma did
Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1918, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.
SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026
