One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 43,041 recorded births

Estella

#509 in the US in 2025

Where Estella stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#509girls’ names · US 2025

Estella was the 509th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 581 births.

peak 1921 · 638188019532025

Its moment was 1921, when 638 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#509US rank, 2025 (girls)
581US births in 2025
#106its best US rank, in 1883
1921peak year — 638 births
42,920US births since 1880
11NZ births since 2008
110E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Estella's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Estella was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Estella in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0104207
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Estella in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 109% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Estella in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Estella has been registered 11 times since 2008, peaking in 2008 with 11 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.03061
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Estella in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Estella in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Estella was registered 110 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 21 births. It ranked #2,277 for girls in 2025 on 12 births. Across those years it has been rising.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.04.08.0
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Estella in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#111162
1890#122320
1900#159365
1910#181377
1920#264616
1930#310460
1940#337358
1950#401396
1960#587285
1970#884150
1980#1,276100
1990#2,23457
2000#2,30667
2010#1,004250
2020#731375

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Estella most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas5,843
California3,327
Mississippi1,720
Georgia1,545
Pennsylvania1,428
Ohio1,158
Alabama1,045
North Carolina1,040
New York1,031
Illinois987

Questions about Estella

How popular is the name Estella?

Estella ranked #509 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 581 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Estella most popular?

Estella peaked in 1921, when 638 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Estella rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Estella has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+109%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1921, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.