One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 297,624 recorded births

Eva

#134 in the US in 2025

Where Eva stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#134girls’ names · US 2025

Eva was the 134th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 2,154 births.

peak 1918 · 4,563188019532025

Its moment was 1918, when 4,563 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#134US rank, 2025 (girls)
2,154US births in 2025
#31its best US rank, in 1889
1918peak year — 4,563 births
284,761US births since 1880
4,753NZ births since 1900
7,103E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Eva's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Eva was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Eva in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0400799
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Eva in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 38% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Eva in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Eva has been registered 4,753 times since 1900, peaking in 2012 with 160 births. It ranked #61 for girls in 2025 on 58 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.06061212
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Eva in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Eva in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Eva was registered 7,103 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 1,276 births. It ranked #58 for girls in 2025 on 758 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0235471
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Eva in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#41614
1890#321,436
1900#332,089
1910#452,123
1920#584,498
1930#863,019
1940#1321,890
1950#1751,622
1960#2041,685
1970#2851,026
1980#298838
1990#342780
2000#2941,088
2010#913,280
2020#932,847

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Eva most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas22,255
California21,431
New York14,284
Pennsylvania10,905
North Carolina9,353
Georgia9,112
Illinois9,076
Florida8,059
Ohio7,958
Virginia6,919

Questions about Eva

How popular is the name Eva?

Eva ranked #134 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 2,154 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Eva most popular?

Eva peaked in 1918, when 4,563 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Eva rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Eva has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-38%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1918, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.