One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 38,891 recorded births

Fern

#1,219 in the US in 2025

Where Fern stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,219girls’ names · US 2025

Fern was the 1,219th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 186 births.

peak 1918 · 1,341188019532025

Its moment was 1918, when 1,341 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,219US rank, 2025 (girls)
186US births in 2025
#152its best US rank, in 1916
1918peak year — 1,341 births
37,666US births since 1880
312NZ births since 2004
913E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Fern's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Fern was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Fern in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.064128
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Fern in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 136% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Fern in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Fern has been registered 312 times since 2004, peaking in 2021 with 29 births. It ranked #209 for girls in 2025 on 19 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.095190
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Fern in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Fern in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Fern was registered 913 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 149 births. It ranked #301 for girls in 2025 on 149 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.02959
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Fern in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#54710
1890#224119
1900#193266
1910#174394
1920#1701,304
1930#246633
1940#359328
1950#547228
1960#755183
1970#1,49067
1980#4,32717
1990#8,5019
2000#5,93718
2010#4,39733
2020#1,559135

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Fern most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Illinois2,351
Pennsylvania2,303
Missouri2,109
New York1,803
Minnesota1,514
Iowa1,383
Michigan1,322
Wisconsin1,246
Ohio1,238
Oklahoma1,227

Questions about Fern

How popular is the name Fern?

Fern ranked #1,219 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 186 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Fern most popular?

Fern peaked in 1918, when 1,341 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Fern rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Fern has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+136%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1918, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.