One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 146,485 recorded births

Grant

#228 in the US in 2025

Where Grant stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#228boys’ names · US 2025

Grant was the 228th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,555 births.

peak 1997 · 3,315188019532025

Its moment was 1997, when 3,315 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#228US rank, 2025 (boys)
1,555US births in 2025
#115its best US rank, in 1997
1997peak year — 3,315 births
136,462US births since 1880
9,982NZ births since 1938
41E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Grant's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Grant was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Grant in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.088176
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Grant in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 27% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Grant in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Grant has been registered 9,982 times since 1938, peaking in 1962 with 471 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

19001920194019601980200020200.07941587
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Grant in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Grant in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Grant was registered 41 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 12 births. It did not clear the ONS reporting floor of 3 in 2025. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.02.03.9
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Grant in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#22552
1890#20365
1900#21882
1910#24496
1920#282391
1930#317304
1940#314317
1950#317469
1960#293718
1970#271782
1980#2171,107
1990#1831,694
2000#1233,174
2010#1552,537
2020#2131,771

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Grant most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California13,084
Texas8,737
Ohio7,607
Illinois6,702
Pennsylvania5,916
Michigan5,818
Minnesota4,745
New York4,486
Indiana4,463
Missouri4,341

Questions about Grant

How popular is the name Grant?

Grant ranked #228 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 1,555 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Grant most popular?

Grant peaked in 1997, when 3,315 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Grant rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Grant has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-27%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1997, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.