One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 257,697 recorded births

Isaiah

#57 in the US in 2025

Where Isaiah stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#57boys’ names · US 2025

Isaiah was the 57th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 5,267 births.

peak 2006 · 10,459188019532025

Its moment was 2006, when 10,459 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#57US rank, 2025 (boys)
5,267US births in 2025
#39its best US rank, in 2006
2006peak year — 10,459 births
254,020US births since 1880
1,499NZ births since 1992
2,178E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Isaiah's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Isaiah was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Isaiah in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0254509
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Isaiah in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Isaiah in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Isaiah has been registered 1,499 times since 1992, peaking in 2008 with 64 births. It ranked #57 for boys in 2025 on 62 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0195391
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Isaiah in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Isaiah in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Isaiah was registered 2,178 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 338 births. It ranked #156 for boys in 2025 on 338 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.062124
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Isaiah in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#26740
1890#27041
1900#39332
1910#44039
1920#559122
1930#553119
1940#555113
1950#578138
1960#78295
1970#1,14252
1980#438355
1990#2051,489
2000#478,029
2010#438,589
2020#516,094

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Isaiah most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California38,323
Texas26,650
Florida14,388
New York12,670
Ohio9,211
Illinois8,807
Pennsylvania8,435
North Carolina8,194
Georgia8,022
Virginia6,626

Questions about Isaiah

How popular is the name Isaiah?

Isaiah ranked #57 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 5,267 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Isaiah most popular?

Isaiah peaked in 2006, when 10,459 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Isaiah rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Isaiah has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2006, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.