One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 1,014,225 recorded births

Jacob

#43 in the US in 2025

Where Jacob stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#43boys’ names · US 2025

Jacob was the 43rd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 6,152 births.

peak 1998 · 36,031188019532025

Its moment was 1998, when 36,031 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#43US rank, 2025 (boys)
6,152US births in 2025
#1its best US rank, in 1999
1998peak year — 36,031 births
988,227US births since 1880
9,693NZ births since 1968
14,000E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jacob's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jacob was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jacob in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.09431885
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jacob in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 53% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jacob in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jacob has been registered 9,693 times since 1968, peaking in 2000 with 370 births. It ranked #83 for boys in 2025 on 49 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.09151830
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jacob in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jacob in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Jacob was registered 14,000 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 3,065 births. It ranked #41 for boys in 2025 on 1,258 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.05041009
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jacob in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#39404
1890#66290
1900#101233
1910#117273
1920#1431,050
1930#212622
1940#234514
1950#318465
1960#351493
1970#255910
1980#438,520
1990#2022,022
2000#134,492
2010#122,157
2020#159,309

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jacob most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California110,946
Texas82,859
New York52,853
Ohio46,247
Illinois43,199
Florida40,649
Michigan40,440
Pennsylvania40,402
Indiana26,909
North Carolina26,795

Questions about Jacob

How popular is the name Jacob?

Jacob ranked #43 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 6,152 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jacob most popular?

Jacob peaked in 1998, when 36,031 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jacob rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Jacob has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-53%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1998, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.