One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 135,282 recorded births

Jake

#457 in the US in 2025

Where Jake stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#457boys’ names · US 2025

Jake was the 457th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 682 births.

peak 2004 · 4,473188019532025

Its moment was 2004, when 4,473 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#457US rank, 2025 (boys)
682US births in 2025
#96its best US rank, in 2000
2004peak year — 4,473 births
129,322US births since 1880
2,874NZ births since 1985
3,086E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jake's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jake was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jake in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0113225
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jake in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 52% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jake in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jake has been registered 2,874 times since 1985, peaking in 2011 with 120 births. It ranked #176 for boys in 2025 on 27 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0300599
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jake in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jake in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Jake was registered 3,086 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 755 births. It ranked #235 for boys in 2025 on 213 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0124248
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jake in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#14196
1890#18672
1900#172121
1910#184148
1920#296362
1930#382221
1940#435177
1950#485192
1960#625155
1970#662153
1980#332567
1990#1402,227
2000#964,091
2010#1153,440
2020#3201,036

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jake most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California15,934
Texas10,590
New York10,441
Florida6,510
New Jersey6,082
Illinois5,162
Massachusetts4,294
Pennsylvania4,024
Georgia3,509
Michigan3,173

Questions about Jake

How popular is the name Jake?

Jake ranked #457 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 682 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jake most popular?

Jake peaked in 2004, when 4,473 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jake rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Jake has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-52%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2004, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.