One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 5,338,989 recorded births

James

#6 in the US in 2025

Where James stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#6boys’ names · US 2025

James was the 6th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 11,945 births.

peak 1947 · 94,767188019532025

Its moment was 1947, when 94,767 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#6US rank, 2025 (boys)
11,945US births in 2025
#1its best US rank, in 1940
1947peak year — 94,767 births
5,250,638US births since 1880
52,954NZ births since 1900
11,512E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How James's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. James was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

James in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.028235646
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. James in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

James in New Zealand

In New Zealand, James has been registered 52,954 times since 1900, peaking in 1990 with 678 births. It ranked #13 for boys in 2025 on 138 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.024464892
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. James in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

James in England & Wales

In England and Wales, James was registered 11,512 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 2,336 births. It ranked #42 for boys in 2025 on 1,211 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0384769
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. James in England and Wales, 2019–2025
boysgirls

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#35,927
1890#35,097
1900#37,245
1910#29,194
1920#447,908
1930#253,957
1940#162,481
1950#186,228
1960#376,815
1970#261,735
1980#539,312
1990#832,359
2000#1817,991
2010#1913,901
2020#612,390

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered James most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York348,452
Pennsylvania305,924
California288,257
Texas284,797
Ohio263,196
Illinois254,727
North Carolina212,379
Michigan189,909
Georgia187,301
Tennessee175,232

Questions about James

How popular is the name James?

James ranked #6 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 11,945 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was James most popular?

James peaked in 1947, when 94,767 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is James rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, James has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1947, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.