One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Given to both sexes · 7,040 recorded births

Marlowe

#523 in the US in 2025

Where Marlowe stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#523girls’ names · US 2025

Marlowe was the 523rd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 575 births.

peak 2025 · 575BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR — NOT PUBLISHED188019532025

Its moment was 2025, when 575 babies were given it. In 36 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#523US rank, 2025 (girls)
575US births in 2025
#523its best US rank, in 2025
2025peak year — 575 births
4,805US births since 1918
424E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Marlowe's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Marlowe was under the floor in 36 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Marlowe in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.01836
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Marlowe in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 148% as a share of girls' births.

Marlowe is given to both sexes: 5,229 female and 1,811 male births on record. The two curves rarely move together, which is why they are drawn separately rather than summed.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Marlowe in New Zealand

Marlowe never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Marlowe in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Marlowe was registered 424 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2021 with 72 births. It ranked #585 for girls in 2025 on 67 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.01326
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Marlowe in England and Wales, 2019–2025
girlsboys

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1920below floor<5
1930#4,5505
1940#4,3495
1950#4,7386
1960below floor<5
1970#4,49212
1980#8,1787
1990#8,5019
2000#6,80815
2010#2,75264
2020#924279

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Marlowe most often since 1918. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

Questions about Marlowe

How popular is the name Marlowe?

Marlowe ranked #523 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 575 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Marlowe most popular?

Marlowe peaked in 2025, when 575 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Marlowe rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Marlowe has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+148%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2025, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.