One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 13,747 recorded births

Maud

13,159 US births on record

Where Maud stands

United States register · 1880–2025

13,159US births · 1880–2025

Maud has been registered 13,159 times in the United States since 1880. It did not clear the 5-birth reporting floor in 2025, so the SSA published no figure for it that year.

peak 1886 · 478188019532025

Its moment was 1886, when 478 babies were given it. In 38 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

<5US births in 2025 — below the reporting floor, so not published
#68its best US rank, in 1883
1886peak year — 478 births
13,159US births since 1880
540NZ births since 1900
48E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Maud's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Maud was under the floor in 38 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Maud in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0200401
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Maud in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 1996 and 2024 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Maud in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Maud has been registered 540 times since 1900, peaking in 1900 with 42 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0265530
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Maud in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Maud in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Maud was registered 48 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2021 with 10 births. It ranked #4,200 for girls in 2025 on 5 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.01.93.9
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Maud in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#70345
1890#97439
1900#184286
1910#319143
1920#569159
1930#85670
1940#1,59124
1950#2,25319
1960#3,92011
1970#5,06110
1980below floor<5
1990below floor<5
2000below floor<5
2010below floor<5
2020below floor<5

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Maud most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

Questions about Maud

How popular is the name Maud?

Maud did not clear the 5-birth reporting floor in 2025, so no figure was published for it that year. Its best US rank was #68 in 1883.

When was Maud most popular?

Maud peaked in 1886, when 478 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Maud rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Maud has been steady between 1996 and 2024.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1886, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.