One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 48,664 recorded births

Nadia

#565 in the US in 2025

Where Nadia stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#565girls’ names · US 2025

Nadia was the 565th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 531 births.

peak 2005 · 1,923188019532025

Its moment was 2005, when 1,923 babies were given it. In 1 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#565US rank, 2025 (girls)
531US births in 2025
#178its best US rank, in 2005
2005peak year — 1,923 births
46,556US births since 1911
1,262NZ births since 1976
846E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Nadia's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Nadia was under the floor in 1 year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Nadia in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.052104
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nadia in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 36% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nadia in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Nadia has been registered 1,262 times since 1976, peaking in 1976 with 46 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0116231
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nadia in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nadia in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Nadia was registered 846 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2021 with 169 births. It ranked #490 for girls in 2025 on 81 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.03162
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nadia in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1920#3,3409
1930#1,49927
1940#3,2088
1950#2,12121
1960#1,54252
1970#1,45270
1980#409546
1990#395659
2000#2561,271
2010#2481,288
2020#468658

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Nadia most often since 1911. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California6,925
Texas4,805
New York4,122
Illinois2,442
Florida2,291
Ohio1,595
Pennsylvania1,585
Michigan1,558
Georgia1,496
North Carolina1,424

Questions about Nadia

How popular is the name Nadia?

Nadia ranked #565 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 531 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Nadia most popular?

Nadia peaked in 2005, when 1,923 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Nadia rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Nadia has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-36%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2005, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.