One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 602,844 recorded births

Nathan

#63 in the US in 2025

Where Nathan stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#63boys’ names · US 2025

Nathan was the 63rd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 4,975 births.

peak 2004 · 14,634188019532025

Its moment was 2004, when 14,634 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#63US rank, 2025 (boys)
4,975US births in 2025
#20its best US rank, in 2004
2004peak year — 14,634 births
587,497US births since 1880
9,676NZ births since 1961
3,897E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Nathan's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Nathan was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Nathan in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0369737
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nathan in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 31% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nathan in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Nathan has been registered 9,676 times since 1961, peaking in 1979 with 288 births. It ranked #91 for boys in 2025 on 47 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.06371274
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nathan in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Nathan in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Nathan was registered 3,897 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 616 births. It ranked #99 for boys in 2025 on 528 births.

20200.0107215
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Nathan in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#115114
1890#130110
1900#125186
1910#135245
1920#172815
1930#234540
1940#243497
1950#243751
1960#1901,630
1970#1302,545
1980#3611,138
1990#4410,934
2000#3013,040
2010#2711,380
2020#555,702

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Nathan most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California75,337
Texas46,829
Ohio27,597
Pennsylvania27,563
New York27,076
Illinois26,623
Michigan23,446
Florida21,128
Minnesota15,523
Indiana15,273

Questions about Nathan

How popular is the name Nathan?

Nathan ranked #63 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 4,975 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Nathan most popular?

Nathan peaked in 2004, when 14,634 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Nathan rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Nathan has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-31%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2004, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.