One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 306,539 recorded births

Oliver

#3 in the US in 2025

Where Oliver stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#3boys’ names · US 2025

Oliver was the 3rd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 14,939 births.

peak 2024 · 15,396188019532025

Its moment was 2024, when 15,396 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#3US rank, 2025 (boys)
14,939US births in 2025
#3its best US rank, in 2019
2024peak year — 15,396 births
269,903US births since 1880
9,419NZ births since 1900
27,217E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Oliver's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Oliver was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Oliver in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0447894
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Oliver in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 27% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Oliver in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Oliver has been registered 9,419 times since 1900, peaking in 2015 with 348 births. It ranked #3 for boys in 2025 on 234 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.09061812
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Oliver in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Oliver in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Oliver was registered 27,217 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 4,932 births. It ranked #6 for boys in 2025 on 3,154 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.08111623
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Oliver in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#69234
1890#81218
1900#95256
1910#103307
1920#1351,164
1930#170850
1940#215582
1950#283556
1960#410370
1970#427367
1980#414393
1990#373625
2000#305978
2010#884,666
2020#314,277

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Oliver most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California28,143
Texas20,245
New York13,777
Florida11,735
Illinois10,784
Ohio10,101
Pennsylvania9,114
Michigan8,124
North Carolina8,074
Georgia7,228

Questions about Oliver

How popular is the name Oliver?

Oliver ranked #3 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 14,939 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Oliver most popular?

Oliver peaked in 2024, when 15,396 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Oliver rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Oliver has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+27%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2024, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.