One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 1,184 recorded births

Pola

#872 in England and Wales in 2025

Where Pola stands

England & Wales register · 2019–2025

#872girls’ names · E&W 2025

Pola was the 872nd most registered girls' name in England and Wales in 2025, on 40 births.

peak 2020 · 98201920222025

Its moment was 2020, when 98 babies were given it.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#872E&W rank, 2025 (girls)
40E&W births in 2025
#433its best E&W rank, in 2020
2020peak year — 98 births
682US births since 1911
502E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Pola's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Pola was under the floor in no year of its E&W record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 3 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Pola in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.01.12.1
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Pola in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2015 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Pola in New Zealand

Pola never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Pola in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Pola was registered 502 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 98 births. It ranked #872 for girls in 2025 on 40 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.01837
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Pola in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1920#4,9755
1930#4,0476
1940#4,3495
1950#5,3015
1960#6,3905
1970#7,0706
1980#9,0956
1990#11,4096
2000below floor<5
2010#11,2469
2020#6,62917

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Pola most often since 1911. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

Questions about Pola

How popular is the name Pola?

Pola ranked #872 for girls in England and Wales in 2025, on 40 births registered with the Office for National Statistics.

When was Pola most popular?

Pola peaked in 2020, when 98 babies in England and Wales were given the name.

Is Pola rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Pola has been steady between 2015 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1926, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.