One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 86,338 recorded births

Rachael

#4,987 in the US in 2025

Where Rachael stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#4,987girls’ names · US 2025

Rachael was the 4,987th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 26 births.

peak 1990 · 3,028188019532025

Its moment was 1990, when 3,028 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#4,987US rank, 2025 (girls)
26US births in 2025
#98its best US rank, in 1987
1990peak year — 3,028 births
82,469US births since 1880
3,794NZ births since 1955
75E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Rachael's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Rachael was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Rachael in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.081163
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rachael in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 82% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Rachael in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Rachael has been registered 3,794 times since 1955, peaking in 1971 with 242 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0466932
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rachael in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Rachael in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Rachael was registered 75 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 24 births. It ranked #3,704 for girls in 2025 on 6 births. Across those years it has been falling.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.04.38.6
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Rachael in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#49212
1890#1,0068
1900#50944
1910#63045
1920#662119
1930#89465
1940#86867
1950#95988
1960#849150
1970#313886
1980#1422,047
1990#1113,028
2000#2281,389
2010#698410
2020#2,59765

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Rachael most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California7,017
Pennsylvania5,050
New York4,934
Texas4,718
Ohio4,513
Michigan3,585
Florida3,378
Illinois3,310
Massachusetts2,468
Indiana2,083

Questions about Rachael

How popular is the name Rachael?

Rachael ranked #4,987 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 26 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Rachael most popular?

Rachael peaked in 1990, when 3,028 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Rachael rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Rachael has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-82%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1990, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.