One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 10,743 recorded births

Racheal

#13,208 in the US in 2025

Where Racheal stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#13,208girls’ names · US 2025

Racheal was the 13,208th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 6 births.

peak 1985 · 388BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR — NOT PUBLISHED188019532025

Its moment was 1985, when 388 babies were given it. In 2 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#13,208US rank, 2025 (girls)
6US births in 2025
#517its best US rank, in 1985
1985peak year — 388 births
10,520US births since 1910
213NZ births since 1970
10E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Racheal's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Racheal was under the floor in 2 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Racheal in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.01123
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Racheal in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2015 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 61% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Racheal in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Racheal has been registered 213 times since 1970, peaking in 1977 with 25 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.062124
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Racheal in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Racheal in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Racheal was registered 10 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2023 with 4 births. It did not clear the ONS reporting floor of 3 in 2025.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.00.81.6
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Racheal in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1910#2,1406
1920#1,62626
1930#2,30614
1940#2,73710
1950#2,18520
1960#2,06131
1970#1,026120
1980#642284
1990#636354
2000#1,245157
2010#2,97657
2020#15,0885

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Racheal most often since 1910. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

Questions about Racheal

How popular is the name Racheal?

Racheal ranked #13,208 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 6 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Racheal most popular?

Racheal peaked in 1985, when 388 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Racheal rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Racheal has been falling between 2015 and 2025 (-61%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1985, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.