One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 118,937 recorded births

Scarlett

#32 in the US in 2025

Where Scarlett stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#32girls’ names · US 2025

Scarlett was the 32nd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 5,644 births.

peak 2017 · 7,721188019532025

Its moment was 2017, when 7,721 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#32US rank, 2025 (girls)
5,644US births in 2025
#14its best US rank, in 2022
2017peak year — 7,721 births
111,687US births since 1937
1,792NZ births since 1996
5,458E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Scarlett's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Scarlett was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Scarlett in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0224447
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Scarlett in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Scarlett in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Scarlett has been registered 1,792 times since 1996, peaking in 2015 with 127 births. It ranked #70 for girls in 2025 on 52 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0381762
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Scarlett in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Scarlett in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Scarlett was registered 5,458 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 1,101 births. It ranked #93 for girls in 2025 on 496 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0197393
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Scarlett in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1940#93559
1950#1,22457
1960#1,33868
1970#1,099107
1980#1,125121
1990#1,063167
2000#941227
2010#1152,717
2020#216,521

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Scarlett most often since 1937. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California15,676
Texas11,379
New York6,246
Florida5,326
Ohio4,080
Pennsylvania3,894
North Carolina3,548
Illinois3,524
Georgia3,407
Arizona2,864

Questions about Scarlett

How popular is the name Scarlett?

Scarlett ranked #32 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 5,644 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Scarlett most popular?

Scarlett peaked in 2017, when 7,721 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Scarlett rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Scarlett has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2017, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.