One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 47,780 recorded births

Shelia

47,780 US births on record

Where Shelia stands

United States register · 1880–2025

47,780US births · 1915–2025

Shelia has been registered 47,780 times in the United States since 1915. It did not clear the 5-birth reporting floor in 2025, so the SSA published no figure for it that year.

peak 1959 · 2,283188019532025

Its moment was 1959, when 2,283 babies were given it. In 2 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

<5US births in 2025 — below the reporting floor, so not published
#170its best US rank, in 1959
1959peak year — 2,283 births
47,780US births since 1915
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Shelia's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Shelia was under the floor in 2 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Shelia in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.058115
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Shelia in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2013 and 2023 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Shelia in New Zealand

Shelia never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Shelia in England & Wales

Shelia does not appear in the ONS list for England and Wales. That means it was given to fewer than 3 babies in every year from 2019 to 2025 — not that it is unused there. ONS publishes only those seven years, so a name that had its moment in England before 2019 is invisible here however common it once was.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1920#3,9577
1930#2,84510
1940#78082
1950#242957
1960#1772,256
1970#2581,192
1980#759218
1990#1,76982
2000#4,52726
2010#8,70113
2020#8,95311

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Shelia most often since 1915. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
North Carolina4,034
Texas4,014
Alabama3,673
Tennessee3,608
Louisiana3,245
Georgia2,965
Mississippi2,745
Kentucky2,325
Virginia2,218
Florida1,554

Questions about Shelia

How popular is the name Shelia?

Shelia did not clear the 5-birth reporting floor in 2025, so no figure was published for it that year. Its best US rank was #170 in 1959.

When was Shelia most popular?

Shelia peaked in 1959, when 2,283 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Shelia rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Shelia has been steady between 2013 and 2023.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1959, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.