One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 83,511 recorded births

Tim

#3,181 in the US in 2025

Where Tim stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#3,181boys’ names · US 2025

Tim was the 3,181st most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 37 births.

peak 1960 · 6,931188019532025

Its moment was 1960, when 6,931 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#3,181US rank, 2025 (boys)
37US births in 2025
#60its best US rank, in 1959
1960peak year — 6,931 births
83,358US births since 1880
91NZ births since 1980
62E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Tim's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Tim was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Tim in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0163325
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Tim in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 40% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Tim in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Tim has been registered 91 times since 1980, peaking in 1990 with 16 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.03366
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Tim in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Tim in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Tim was registered 62 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2024 with 13 births. It ranked #2,951 for boys in 2025 on 7 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.02.34.7
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Tim in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#52612
1890#43417
1900#49022
1910#47434
1920#84664
1930#83261
1940#307333
1950#241754
1960#606,931
1970#1991,324
1980#675165
1990#1,25977
2000#1,38291
2010#2,06965
2020#3,41832

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Tim most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California9,650
Ohio6,601
Michigan5,006
Illinois4,823
Texas3,795
Indiana3,743
Wisconsin2,997
Minnesota2,887
Missouri2,771
Pennsylvania2,601

Questions about Tim

How popular is the name Tim?

Tim ranked #3,181 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 37 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Tim most popular?

Tim peaked in 1960, when 6,931 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Tim rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Tim has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-40%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1960, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.