One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 1,101,579 recorded births

Timothy

#203 in the US in 2025

Where Timothy stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#203boys’ names · US 2025

Timothy was the 203rd most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,734 births.

peak 1959 · 30,783188019532025

Its moment was 1959, when 30,783 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#203US rank, 2025 (boys)
1,734US births in 2025
#11its best US rank, in 1960
1959peak year — 30,783 births
1,084,192US births since 1880
12,292NZ births since 1900
767E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Timothy's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Timothy was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Timothy in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.08201639
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Timothy in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 28% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Timothy in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Timothy has been registered 12,292 times since 1900, peaking in 1981 with 400 births. It ranked #211 for boys in 2025 on 22 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.09081816
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Timothy in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Timothy in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Timothy was registered 767 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 135 births. It ranked #418 for boys in 2025 on 96 births.

20200.02244
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Timothy in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#18070
1890#22156
1900#22876
1910#27975
1920#365269
1930#316306
1940#1351,385
1950#3210,499
1960#1130,498
1970#2022,422
1980#2019,146
1990#3015,700
2000#587,261
2010#1143,454
2020#1922,011

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Timothy most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California86,655
New York75,956
Ohio72,334
Pennsylvania62,329
Illinois62,068
Michigan56,186
Texas44,655
Florida33,167
Indiana33,160
North Carolina32,998

Questions about Timothy

How popular is the name Timothy?

Timothy ranked #203 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 1,734 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Timothy most popular?

Timothy peaked in 1959, when 30,783 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Timothy rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Timothy has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-28%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1959, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.