One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 86,947 recorded births

Velma

#5,722 in the US in 2025

Where Velma stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#5,722girls’ names · US 2025

Velma was the 5,722nd most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 21 births.

peak 1921 · 2,606188019532025

Its moment was 1921, when 2,606 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#5,722US rank, 2025 (girls)
21US births in 2025
#88its best US rank, in 1912
1921peak year — 2,606 births
86,752US births since 1880
195NZ births since 1915
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Velma's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Velma was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Velma in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0134268
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Velma in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 231% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Velma in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Velma has been registered 195 times since 1915, peaking in 1927 with 18 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.082164
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Velma in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Velma in England & Wales

Velma does not appear in the ONS list for England and Wales. That means it was given to fewer than 3 babies in every year from 2019 to 2025 — not that it is unused there. ONS publishes only those seven years, so a name that had its moment in England before 2019 is invisible here however common it once was.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#42116
1890#25496
1900#141426
1910#901,035
1920#1052,491
1930#1271,918
1940#188986
1950#267825
1960#406559
1970#781181
1980#1,51878
1990#3,29733
2000#8,02712
2010#11,2469
2020#7,21215

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Velma most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas7,932
Oklahoma3,994
Mississippi3,941
Missouri3,843
Arkansas3,586
Alabama3,522
Louisiana3,448
Illinois3,268
Tennessee3,260
Ohio2,910

Questions about Velma

How popular is the name Velma?

Velma ranked #5,722 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 21 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Velma most popular?

Velma peaked in 1921, when 2,606 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Velma rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Velma has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+231%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1921, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.