One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 642,932 recorded births

Walter

#251 in the US in 2025

Where Walter stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#251boys’ names · US 2025

Walter was the 251st most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,381 births.

peak 1918 · 13,338188019532025

Its moment was 1918, when 13,338 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#251US rank, 2025 (boys)
1,381US births in 2025
#10its best US rank, in 1914
1918peak year — 13,338 births
631,172US births since 1880
7,131NZ births since 1900
997E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Walter's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Walter was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Walter in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.09131827
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Walter in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 31% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Walter in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Walter has been registered 7,131 times since 1900, peaking in 1907 with 197 births. It ranked #147 for boys in 2025 on 33 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.08621724
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Walter in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Walter in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Walter was registered 997 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 178 births. It ranked #334 for boys in 2025 on 127 births.

20200.02959
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Walter in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#131,755
1890#131,905
1900#122,298
1910#132,596
1920#1313,294
1930#199,731
1940#257,723
1950#407,798
1960#705,763
1970#893,584
1980#1372,009
1990#1911,614
2000#308949
2010#372784
2020#2721,240

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Walter most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York51,531
Pennsylvania47,499
Illinois32,303
California25,984
Ohio25,735
Texas25,628
New Jersey24,101
North Carolina21,848
Georgia21,658
Michigan21,447

Questions about Walter

How popular is the name Walter?

Walter ranked #251 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 1,381 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Walter most popular?

Walter peaked in 1918, when 13,338 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Walter rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Walter has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+31%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1918, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.