One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 13,259 recorded births

Wilhelmina

#1,512 in the US in 2025

Where Wilhelmina stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,512girls’ names · US 2025

Wilhelmina was the 1,512th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 141 births.

peak 1916 · 320188019532025

Its moment was 1916, when 320 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,512US rank, 2025 (girls)
141US births in 2025
#215its best US rank, in 1884
1916peak year — 320 births
13,094US births since 1880
98NZ births since 1901
67E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Wilhelmina's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Wilhelmina was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Wilhelmina in the United States

18801900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 5-BIRTH FLOOR0.03060
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Wilhelmina in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 34% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Wilhelmina in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Wilhelmina has been registered 98 times since 1901, peaking in 1957 with 13 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.074148
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Wilhelmina in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Wilhelmina in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Wilhelmina was registered 67 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 18 births. It ranked #1,639 for girls in 2025 on 18 births. Across those years it has been rising.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.03.67.1
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Wilhelmina in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#25436
1890#25298
1900#309114
1910#319143
1920#463214
1930#518169
1940#675105
1950#782123
1960#1,44758
1970#2,26734
1980#4,32717
1990#6,46513
2000#8,53411
2010#3,74541
2020#1,818108

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Wilhelmina most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

Questions about Wilhelmina

How popular is the name Wilhelmina?

Wilhelmina ranked #1,512 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 141 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Wilhelmina most popular?

Wilhelmina peaked in 1916, when 320 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Wilhelmina rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Wilhelmina has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+34%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1916, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.