One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 140,439 recorded births

Wilma

#3,645 in the US in 2025

Where Wilma stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#3,645girls’ names · US 2025

Wilma was the 3,645th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 41 births.

peak 1925 · 4,175188019532025

Its moment was 1925, when 4,175 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#3,645US rank, 2025 (girls)
41US births in 2025
#62its best US rank, in 1925
1925peak year — 4,175 births
140,101US births since 1880
282NZ births since 1928
56E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Wilma's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Wilma was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Wilma in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0181362
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Wilma in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 97% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Wilma in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Wilma has been registered 282 times since 1928, peaking in 1930 with 22 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.098197
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Wilma in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Wilma in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Wilma was registered 56 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 12 births. It ranked #2,277 for girls in 2025 on 12 births. Across those years it has been rising.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.02.44.7
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Wilma in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#8365
1890#31564
1900#187285
1910#118698
1920#783,670
1930#684,075
1940#932,621
1950#1711,655
1960#362724
1970#731202
1980#1,50279
1990#2,17459
2000#3,88632
2010#4,97428
2020#3,77838

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Wilma most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Ohio8,612
Missouri8,392
Kentucky8,147
Tennessee7,973
Illinois7,576
Texas7,012
Indiana7,004
Oklahoma6,250
North Carolina5,008
Arkansas4,896

Questions about Wilma

How popular is the name Wilma?

Wilma ranked #3,645 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 41 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Wilma most popular?

Wilma peaked in 1925, when 4,175 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Wilma rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Wilma has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+97%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1925, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.