One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 30,387 recorded births

Aisha

#337 in the US in 2025

Where Aisha stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#337girls’ names · US 2025

Aisha was the 337th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 910 births.

peak 1977 · 1,540188019532025

Its moment was 1977, when 1,540 babies were given it. In 6 of the years between, the name fell under the 5-birth floor and the registrar published nothing — those years are the marks along the base of the chart, not gaps in the name's use.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#337US rank, 2025 (girls)
910US births in 2025
#175its best US rank, in 1977
1977peak year — 1,540 births
26,933US births since 1950
266NZ births since 2001
3,188E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Aisha's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Aisha was under the floor in 6 years of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Aisha in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.050100
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Aisha in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 62% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Aisha in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Aisha has been registered 266 times since 2001, peaking in 2017 with 18 births. It ranked #309 for girls in 2025 on 13 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.059118
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Aisha in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Aisha in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Aisha was registered 3,188 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 508 births. It ranked #106 for girls in 2025 on 436 births.

20200.095189
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Aisha in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1950#4,7386
1960below floor<5
1970#1,75551
1980#375619
1990#567410
2000#691341
2010#687417
2020#536562

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Aisha most often since 1950. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York3,923
California2,720
Texas1,890
Illinois1,640
Pennsylvania1,339
Florida1,297
Minnesota1,132
New Jersey1,118
Ohio1,071
Georgia910

Questions about Aisha

How popular is the name Aisha?

Aisha ranked #337 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 910 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Aisha most popular?

Aisha peaked in 1977, when 1,540 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Aisha rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Aisha has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+62%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1977, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.