One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 35,525 recorded births

Charity

#1,981 in the US in 2025

Where Charity stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,981girls’ names · US 2025

Charity was the 1,981st most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 97 births.

peak 1975 · 1,420188019532025

Its moment was 1975, when 1,420 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,981US rank, 2025 (girls)
97US births in 2025
#183its best US rank, in 1975
1975peak year — 1,420 births
35,518US births since 1880
7E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Charity's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Charity was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Charity in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.04997
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Charity in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 46% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Charity in New Zealand

Charity never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Charity in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Charity was registered 7 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 4 births. It ranked #5,926 for girls in 2025 on 3 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.00.71.5
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Charity in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#28829
1890#35053
1900#50944
1910#64044
1920#91463
1930#1,16141
1940#1,11442
1950#1,24155
1960#1,31270
1970#546343
1980#2431,061
1990#458536
2000#456608
2010#851315
2020#1,474145

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Charity most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California2,144
Texas2,081
Ohio1,676
North Carolina1,627
Georgia1,535
Florida1,482
Tennessee1,334
Indiana1,188
Michigan1,127
Alabama1,082

Questions about Charity

How popular is the name Charity?

Charity ranked #1,981 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 97 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Charity most popular?

Charity peaked in 1975, when 1,420 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Charity rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Charity has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-46%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1975, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.