One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 143,128 recorded births

Arlene

#1,631 in the US in 2025

Where Arlene stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,631girls’ names · US 2025

Arlene was the 1,631st most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 127 births.

peak 1934 · 3,917188019532025

Its moment was 1934, when 3,917 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,631US rank, 2025 (girls)
127US births in 2025
#53its best US rank, in 1934
1934peak year — 3,917 births
143,010US births since 1888
112NZ births since 1959
6E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Arlene's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Arlene was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Arlene in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0188375
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Arlene in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Arlene in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Arlene has been registered 112 times since 1959, peaking in 1971 with 18 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.03569
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Arlene in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Arlene in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Arlene was registered 6 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2024 with 3 births. It ranked #5,926 for girls in 2025 on 3 births.

2020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 3-BIRTH FLOOR0.00.61.2
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Arlene in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1890#82511
1900#49447
1910#268207
1920#1451,594
1930#1032,509
1940#753,257
1950#1322,390
1960#2111,625
1970#349718
1980#520371
1990#679314
2000#798286
2010#1,165208
2020#1,571134

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Arlene most often since 1888. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York21,729
Pennsylvania13,781
California12,506
Illinois9,881
Michigan7,195
New Jersey6,745
Wisconsin5,698
Ohio5,625
Minnesota4,659
Massachusetts4,643

Questions about Arlene

How popular is the name Arlene?

Arlene ranked #1,631 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 127 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Arlene most popular?

Arlene peaked in 1934, when 3,917 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Arlene rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Arlene has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1934, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.