One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 177,943 recorded births

Loretta

#606 in the US in 2025

Where Loretta stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#606girls’ names · US 2025

Loretta was the 606th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 485 births.

peak 1938 · 3,913188019532025

Its moment was 1938, when 3,913 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#606US rank, 2025 (girls)
485US births in 2025
#62its best US rank, in 1938
1938peak year — 3,913 births
177,564US births since 1880
196NZ births since 1936
183E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Loretta's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Loretta was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Loretta in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0177355
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Loretta in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been rising — up 123% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Loretta in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Loretta has been registered 196 times since 1936, peaking in 1974 with 15 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.04793
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Loretta in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Loretta in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Loretta was registered 183 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2022 with 40 births. It ranked #894 for girls in 2025 on 39 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.07.715
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Loretta in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#24041
1890#156228
1900#121535
1910#124655
1920#1202,122
1930#1052,482
1940#693,502
1950#1202,720
1960#1383,191
1970#2311,365
1980#494418
1990#921207
2000#1,85592
2010#2,04397
2020#942272

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Loretta most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York16,199
Pennsylvania13,459
Illinois12,063
California9,459
Ohio9,039
Texas7,022
Michigan6,614
Missouri5,365
New Jersey4,928
Kentucky4,909

Questions about Loretta

How popular is the name Loretta?

Loretta ranked #606 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 485 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Loretta most popular?

Loretta peaked in 1938, when 3,913 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Loretta rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Loretta has been rising between 2016 and 2025 (+123%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1938, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.