One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 123,923 recorded births

Priscilla

#544 in the US in 2025

Where Priscilla stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#544girls’ names · US 2025

Priscilla was the 544th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 555 births.

peak 1942 · 1,988188019532025

Its moment was 1942, when 1,988 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#544US rank, 2025 (girls)
555US births in 2025
#127its best US rank, in 1940
1942peak year — 1,988 births
122,796US births since 1880
875NZ births since 1940
252E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Priscilla's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Priscilla was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Priscilla in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.086172
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Priscilla in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Priscilla in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Priscilla has been registered 875 times since 1940, peaking in 1972 with 36 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.072145
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Priscilla in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Priscilla in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Priscilla was registered 252 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 56 births. It ranked #667 for girls in 2025 on 56 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.01122
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Priscilla in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#30926
1890#40040
1900#322110
1910#322142
1920#260637
1930#213824
1940#1271,970
1950#1691,672
1960#2521,215
1970#304936
1980#1871,432
1990#1671,754
2000#2731,170
2010#486621
2020#561523

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Priscilla most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California19,273
Texas15,667
New York8,938
Massachusetts6,827
Florida4,591
Pennsylvania4,440
Illinois4,366
North Carolina3,383
New Jersey2,961
Ohio2,871

Questions about Priscilla

How popular is the name Priscilla?

Priscilla ranked #544 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 555 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Priscilla most popular?

Priscilla peaked in 1942, when 1,988 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Priscilla rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Priscilla has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1942, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.