One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 44,786 recorded births

Dixie

#1,605 in the US in 2025

Where Dixie stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#1,605girls’ names · US 2025

Dixie was the 1,605th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 130 births.

peak 1938 · 1,229188019532025

Its moment was 1938, when 1,229 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#1,605US rank, 2025 (girls)
130US births in 2025
#167its best US rank, in 1938
1938peak year — 1,229 births
44,621US births since 1880
165E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Dixie's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Dixie was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Dixie in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.056111
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Dixie in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 44% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Dixie in New Zealand

Dixie never reached 10 births in a single year in New Zealand, so it does not appear in the DIA file. That is a reporting floor, not a zero — the name may still have been registered here, just never ten times in one year.

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Dixie in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Dixie was registered 165 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 41 births. It ranked #2,137 for girls in 2025 on 13 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.07.615
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Dixie in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#43515
1890#39741
1900#45754
1910#42686
1920#364326
1930#291512
1940#1711,170
1950#295687
1960#457457
1970#844160
1980#889172
1990#1,479105
2000#1,558114
2010#919282
2020#1,078229

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Dixie most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
Texas3,248
California2,461
Missouri2,224
Ohio2,005
Iowa1,903
Illinois1,830
Indiana1,657
Kentucky1,608
North Carolina1,443
Oklahoma1,339

Questions about Dixie

How popular is the name Dixie?

Dixie ranked #1,605 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 130 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Dixie most popular?

Dixie peaked in 1938, when 1,229 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Dixie rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Dixie has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-44%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1938, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.