One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 90,574 recorded births

Bella

#136 in the US in 2025

Where Bella stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#136girls’ names · US 2025

Bella was the 136th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 2,129 births.

peak 2010 · 5,136188019532025

Its moment was 2010, when 5,136 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#136US rank, 2025 (girls)
2,129US births in 2025
#48its best US rank, in 2010
2010peak year — 5,136 births
83,721US births since 1880
1,910NZ births since 1955
4,943E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Bella's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Bella was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Bella in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0144289
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bella in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 36% as a share of girls' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bella in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Bella has been registered 1,910 times since 1955, peaking in 2009 with 124 births. It ranked #88 for girls in 2025 on 43 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0355709
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bella in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Bella in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Bella was registered 4,943 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 958 births. It ranked #91 for girls in 2025 on 515 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0171342
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Bella in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#46613
1890#38442
1900#38873
1910#46673
1920#504188
1930#90964
1940#1,84519
1950#2,12121
1960#2,09730
1970#2,35432
1980#4,32717
1990#3,71428
2000#749307
2010#485,136
2020#633,649

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Bella most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California13,218
Texas8,127
New York6,089
Florida5,470
Pennsylvania3,144
Illinois2,642
Georgia2,375
North Carolina2,372
Ohio2,263
Arizona2,053

Questions about Bella

How popular is the name Bella?

Bella ranked #136 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 2,129 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Bella most popular?

Bella peaked in 2010, when 5,136 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Bella rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Bella has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-36%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2010, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.