One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 78,381 recorded births

Lila

#186 in the US in 2025

Where Lila stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#186girls’ names · US 2025

Lila was the 186th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 1,670 births.

peak 2010 · 1,969188019532025

Its moment was 2010, when 1,969 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#186US rank, 2025 (girls)
1,670US births in 2025
#155its best US rank, in 2010
2010peak year — 1,969 births
76,493US births since 1880
494NZ births since 1904
1,394E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Lila's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Lila was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Lila in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.055111
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lila in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Lila in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Lila has been registered 494 times since 1904, peaking in 2025 with 28 births. It ranked #140 for girls in 2025 on 28 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0102203
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lila in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Lila in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Lila was registered 1,394 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2025 with 277 births. It ranked #179 for girls in 2025 on 277 births. Across those years it has been rising.

20200.055109
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Lila in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#25436
1890#222120
1900#191268
1910#209311
1920#227840
1930#1701,203
1940#270529
1950#432351
1960#578291
1970#1,012123
1980#986150
1990#1,300125
2000#749307
2010#1551,969
2020#2281,298

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Lila most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California5,340
New York5,272
Texas4,311
Illinois2,951
Michigan2,840
Pennsylvania2,634
Ohio2,458
North Carolina2,454
Georgia2,222
South Carolina2,193

Questions about Lila

How popular is the name Lila?

Lila ranked #186 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 1,670 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Lila most popular?

Lila peaked in 2010, when 1,969 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Lila rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Lila has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2010, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.