One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 82,902 recorded births

Byron

#980 in the US in 2025

Where Byron stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#980boys’ names · US 2025

Byron was the 980th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 233 births.

peak 1964 · 1,284188019532025

Its moment was 1964, when 1,284 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#980US rank, 2025 (boys)
233US births in 2025
#193its best US rank, in 1882
1964peak year — 1,284 births
82,238US births since 1880
489NZ births since 1970
175E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Byron's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Byron was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Byron in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.03468
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Byron in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 33% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Byron in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Byron has been registered 489 times since 1970, peaking in 1984 with 43 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.094187
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Byron in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Byron in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Byron was registered 175 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2021 with 38 births. It ranked #1,896 for boys in 2025 on 13 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.06.413
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Byron in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#22552
1890#22952
1900#26261
1910#25689
1920#224571
1930#256474
1940#227547
1950#222830
1960#2341,191
1970#2061,230
1980#2311,025
1990#2651,016
2000#439544
2010#465565
2020#790294

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Byron most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California7,727
Texas7,540
Illinois4,176
Louisiana4,089
New York3,149
Ohio3,028
Florida3,014
Pennsylvania2,931
Georgia2,720
Missouri2,571

Questions about Byron

How popular is the name Byron?

Byron ranked #980 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 233 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Byron most popular?

Byron peaked in 1964, when 1,284 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Byron rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Byron has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-33%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1964, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.