One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 276,179 recorded births

Connie

#3,067 in the US in 2025

Where Connie stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#3,067girls’ names · US 2025

Connie was the 3,067th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 53 births.

peak 1955 · 9,975188019532025

Its moment was 1955, when 9,975 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#3,067US rank, 2025 (girls)
53US births in 2025
#35its best US rank, in 1955
1955peak year — 9,975 births
266,783US births since 1880
155NZ births since 1962
2,281E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Connie's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Connie was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Connie in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0255510
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Connie in the United States, 1880–2025
girlsboys

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Connie in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Connie has been registered 155 times since 1962, peaking in 1965 with 16 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.03978
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Connie in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Connie in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Connie was registered 2,281 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 367 births. It ranked #154 for girls in 2025 on 324 births.

20200.066131
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Connie in England and Wales, 2019–2025
girlsboys

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#49212
1890#41237
1900#43159
1910#350129
1920#292494
1930#219782
1940#882,795
1950#448,145
1960#478,881
1970#1163,326
1980#299836
1990#484505
2000#1,150176
2010#2,16790
2020#2,96654

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Connie most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California18,400
Ohio17,544
Texas17,132
Illinois13,186
Pennsylvania11,915
Michigan11,778
Indiana10,528
Missouri9,210
New York9,104
Iowa8,510

Questions about Connie

How popular is the name Connie?

Connie ranked #3,067 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 53 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Connie most popular?

Connie peaked in 1955, when 9,975 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Connie rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Connie has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1955, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.