One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 396,891 recorded births

Elijah

#7 in the US in 2025

Where Elijah stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#7boys’ names · US 2025

Elijah was the 7th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 11,111 births.

peak 2011 · 14,001188019532025

Its moment was 2011, when 14,001 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#7US rank, 2025 (boys)
11,111US births in 2025
#4its best US rank, in 2020
2011peak year — 14,001 births
380,611US births since 1880
3,676NZ births since 1988
11,297E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Elijah's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Elijah was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Elijah in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0383767
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Elijah in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Elijah in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Elijah has been registered 3,676 times since 1988, peaking in 2015 with 175 births. It ranked #9 for boys in 2025 on 151 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0489978
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Elijah in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Elijah in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Elijah was registered 11,297 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2020 with 1,668 births. It ranked #23 for boys in 2025 on 1,659 births.

20200.0303606
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Elijah in England and Wales, 2019–2025
boysgirls

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#135100
1890#20464
1900#21086
1910#233101
1920#355277
1930#378226
1940#404201
1950#403282
1960#580180
1970#596184
1980#279754
1990#2431,139
2000#527,472
2010#1813,920
2020#413,238

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Elijah most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California41,556
Texas35,089
Florida23,652
New York18,317
Georgia15,525
North Carolina15,135
Ohio14,188
Illinois12,149
Pennsylvania11,919
Tennessee11,351

Questions about Elijah

How popular is the name Elijah?

Elijah ranked #7 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 11,111 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Elijah most popular?

Elijah peaked in 2011, when 14,001 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Elijah rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Elijah has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2011, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.