One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 305,186 recorded births

Jackson

#36 in the US in 2025

Where Jackson stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#36boys’ names · US 2025

Jackson was the 36th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 6,582 births.

peak 2013 · 12,610188019532025

Its moment was 2013, when 12,610 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#36US rank, 2025 (boys)
6,582US births in 2025
#14its best US rank, in 2021
2013peak year — 12,610 births
297,220US births since 1880
4,196NZ births since 1974
3,770E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jackson's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jackson was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jackson in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.0333667
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jackson in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been falling — down 35% as a share of boys' births.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jackson in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jackson has been registered 4,196 times since 1974, peaking in 2015 with 175 births. It ranked #57 for boys in 2025 on 62 births.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.0449898
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jackson in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jackson in England & Wales

In England and Wales, Jackson was registered 3,770 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 675 births. It ranked #138 for boys in 2025 on 372 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.0111222
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jackson in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#24446
1890#35125
1900#26660
1910#35951
1920#389233
1930#389216
1940#449166
1950#521164
1960#726112
1970#791108
1980#503283
1990#316794
2000#725,903
2010#2511,823
2020#179,138

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jackson most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
California23,572
Texas21,895
Florida13,425
North Carolina12,630
Georgia12,564
Ohio12,000
New York11,799
Illinois10,627
Pennsylvania10,405
Tennessee9,718

Questions about Jackson

How popular is the name Jackson?

Jackson ranked #36 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 6,582 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jackson most popular?

Jackson peaked in 2013, when 12,610 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jackson rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, Jackson has been falling between 2016 and 2025 (-35%).

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 2013, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.