One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Boys' name · 1,548,722 recorded births

George

#126 in the US in 2025

Where George stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#126boys’ names · US 2025

George was the 126th most registered boys' name in the United States in 2025, on 2,848 births.

peak 1921 · 27,476188019532025

Its moment was 1921, when 27,476 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#126US rank, 2025 (boys)
2,848US births in 2025
#4its best US rank, in 1881
1921peak year — 27,476 births
1,487,297US births since 1880
25,114NZ births since 1900
26,348E&W births, 2019–2025
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How George's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. George was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

George in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.023204639
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. George in the United States, 1880–2025
boysgirls

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

George in New Zealand

In New Zealand, George has been registered 25,114 times since 1900, peaking in 1910 with 498 births. It ranked #4 for boys in 2025 on 178 births.

19001920194019601980200020200.023884776
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. George in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

George in England & Wales

In England and Wales, George was registered 26,348 times between 2019 and 2025, peaking in 2019 with 4,575 births. It ranked #7 for boys in 2025 on 3,082 births. Across those years it has been falling.

20200.07531505
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 3-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. George in England and Wales, 2019–2025

Seven years is a window, not a history. Unlike the American and New Zealand series this one cannot show you a name's arrival or its long decline — ONS publishes the full list only from 2019. England and Wales only: Scotland and Northern Ireland publish separately and are not counted here.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#55,126
1890#44,458
1900#45,403
1910#55,441
1920#626,891
1930#822,788
1940#1118,315
1950#2020,183
1960#3314,063
1970#408,911
1980#605,300
1990#794,567
2000#1303,037
2010#1652,374
2020#1322,775

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered George most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York135,180
Pennsylvania119,344
California80,648
Illinois72,286
Texas66,587
Ohio62,105
New Jersey54,779
Massachusetts50,371
Michigan45,376
North Carolina41,846

Questions about George

How popular is the name George?

George ranked #126 for boys in the United States in 2025, on 2,848 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was George most popular?

George peaked in 1921, when 27,476 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is George rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all boys' births, George has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1921, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.