One subject, in depth · bridged to FuelFacts
NameCurve
Girls' name · 69,356 recorded births

Jeannette

#5,238 in the US in 2025

Where Jeannette stands

United States register · 1880–2025

#5,238girls’ names · US 2025

Jeannette was the 5,238th most registered girls' name in the United States in 2025, on 24 births.

peak 1917 · 1,113188019532025

Its moment was 1917, when 1,113 babies were given it.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

#5,238US rank, 2025 (girls)
24US births in 2025
#173its best US rank, in 1916
1917peak year — 1,113 births
69,251US births since 1880
105NZ births since 1938
Saved in this browser only — no account, nothing sent anywhere.

How Jeannette's figures are worked out

  1. Counts come straight from the registrars: the US Social Security Administration (1880–2025) and the New Zealand Department of Internal Affairs (1900–2025). Nothing is scraped from another names site. The SSA files are the agency's own, retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified.
  2. Ranks are computed against every name in that year's file, not just the ones this site publishes pages for — otherwise a rank would flatter every name we happen to list.
  3. The curve is drawn on births per 100,000 of that sex, not raw counts. Raw counts across eras are misleading: far more births were registered in 1957 than in 1890, so a flat count is a falling share.
  4. The reporting floor. Each registrar publishes a name only once it clears a threshold — 5 births of that sex in the US, 10 in New Zealand. Expressed as a share that threshold is itself a curve, and it is drawn on every chart here as the shaded band along the base.
  5. A missing year is a suppressed value, never a zero. Where the registrar published nothing, this site prints “below floor” or “<5”, the curve is broken rather than drawn across the gap, and the missing years are marked on the floor line. Jeannette was under the floor in no year of its US record.
share per 100,000 = births ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000
reporting floor (share) = 5 ÷ all births of that sex that year × 100,000

Full methodology →

Jeannette in the United States

188019001920194019601980200020200.052104
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 5-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jeannette in the United States, 1880–2025

Between 2016 and 2025 the name has been steady.

SOURCE·US Social Security Administration, national baby-name data·Public domain. retrieved from the Internet Archive's 2026 snapshot of ssa.gov (ssa.gov refuses automated requests); files unmodified. SSA lists a name only if it was given to at least 5 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jeannette in New Zealand

In New Zealand, Jeannette has been registered 105 times since 1938, peaking in 1945 with 14 births. It did not clear the DIA's 10-birth reporting floor in 2025.

1900192019401960198020002020NOT PUBLISHED — BELOW THE 10-BIRTH FLOOR0.051102
Births per 100,000 of that sex, so eras compare fairly. The shaded band is the 10-birth reporting floor — under it the registrar publishes nothing, so a line that stops has left the record, not fallen to zero. Jeannette in New Zealand, 1900–2025

SOURCE·NZ Department of Internal Affairs, births by first name·CC BY 4.0. DIA lists a name only if it was given to at least 10 babies of that sex that year.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Jeannette in England & Wales

Jeannette does not appear in the ONS list for England and Wales. That means it was given to fewer than 3 babies in every year from 2019 to 2025 — not that it is unused there. ONS publishes only those seven years, so a name that had its moment in England before 2019 is invisible here however common it once was.

SOURCE·Office for National Statistics, baby names in England and Wales·Open Government Licence v3.0. ONS redacts any name given to 2 or fewer babies of that sex that year, under s40 of the Freedom of Information Act.·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Decade by decade in the US

US rank and births at each decade markSSA · JUL 2026
YearRankBirths
1880#26534
1890#25099
1900#248170
1910#191347
1920#1891,060
1930#195987
1940#1811,039
1950#256884
1960#305938
1970#352714
1980#450474
1990#769266
2000#2,45762
2010#3,68942
2020#4,64828

<5 = the SSA published no figure for that year. It is a suppressed value, not a zero.

Where in the United States

The states that registered Jeannette most often since 1880. These are lifetime totals, so they track state population as much as local taste — a name common in Wyoming will never out-count California.

StateBirths
New York7,399
California6,454
Massachusetts4,567
Pennsylvania4,025
Ohio3,529
Illinois3,500
Texas2,536
Michigan2,277
New Jersey1,996
Georgia1,426

Questions about Jeannette

How popular is the name Jeannette?

Jeannette ranked #5,238 for girls in the United States in 2025, on 24 births registered with the Social Security Administration.

When was Jeannette most popular?

Jeannette peaked in 1917, when 1,113 babies in the United States were given the name.

Is Jeannette rising or falling?

Measured as a share of all girls' births, Jeannette has been steady between 2016 and 2025.

Same sex, peaking within a few years of 1917, at a comparable scale. Not a taste engine — this is arithmetic on peak years, which is why it will occasionally hand you something unfashionable that is nonetheless exactly of the period.

SOURCE·US SSA (1880–2025) + NZ DIA (1900–2025) birth registrations·ranks and shares computed from the source files, see method·REVIEWED JUL 2026

See what every site in this family answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.